Gauri Ajit Bhide v. Ajit Madhav Bhide
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim application in a contempt petition seeking directions that the respondent refrain from alleging non-cooperation in sale of subject property. Reply not yet filed; court directed respondent's advocate to take instructions and listed the matter first on board.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
915.ia.13597.24.doc
Ajay
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 13597 OF 2024
IN
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 513 OF 2023
Gauri Ajit Bhide .. Applicant IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Gauri Ajit Bhide .. Petitioner Versus Ajit Madhav Bhide Respondent / .. Contemnor
- Mr. Hitesh Vyas a/w. Mr. Rasik Raut, Advocates for Applicant / Petitioner.
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : OCTOBER 16, 2024.
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Vyas, learned Advocate for Applicant / Petitioner.
2. Mr. Vyas makes a grievance that urgent indulgence is required since notice has been received by the Petitioner with respect to taking over possession of the properties on 22.10.2024. He would therefor persuade the Court to hear the Petitioner. He would equally inform and submit that the Respondent is represented by an Advocate and the Advocate has filed his vakalatnama in the Contempt Petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Gauri Ajit Bhide
- respondent
Ajit Madhav Bhide
Coram
Milind N. Jadhav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
21 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Shahahji Nanai Thorat @ Shahajirao Dhondiba Thorat vs the State of Maharashtra
Mohammed Israili vs Reliance Commercial Finance Limited
Anannd Khosla Son of Pawan Khosla and Anr. vs Punam Kumari Singh
Ram Bapu Jethe vs the State of Maharashtra Throu. the Sec. Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Dept and Ors.