Appeal against rejection of anticipatory bail allowed. The learned judge noted that the prosecution failed to file a chargesheet against the appellant despite filing it against others, granting interim protection absolute status.
Interim protection granted in favour of the Appellant is made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sonali Mane
42-APEAL-580-2024.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 580 OF 2024
Gokul Baban Maware … Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra And Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Sarang S. Aradhye a/w Ms. Gauri Velankar & Mr. Shantanu Gurave, Ms. Shruti Kothavade for the Appellant.
Ms. Shilpa G. Talhar, APP for the Respondent No.1-State.
Ms. Manisha Devkar for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 12 SEPTEMBER 2024.
P.C. :
___Page No.1 of 2 ___ 12 September 2024
MANESONALIDILIP Digitallysigned byMANESONALIDILIPDate:2024.09.1314:57:28+0530
Sonali Mane
42-APEAL-580-2024.docx
[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]
___Page No.2 of 2 ___ 12 September 2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal against rejection of anticipatory bail is maintainable when the prosecution agency has not filed a chargesheet against the appellant.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Gokul Baban Maware
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.2
Sandip V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
