Petitioners sought withdrawal of a writ petition, stating the matter was settled between the parties by mutual compromise. The court took the withdrawal letter on record and disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903.wp.6585.2007.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Writ Petition NO. 6585 OF 2007
Smt.housabai Laxman Tathe And Ors ...Petitioner(s) Versus Sou.sushilabai Sumanrao Poman ...Respondent(s)
Mr. Ojas Kocharekar for Petitioners.
Mr. Sandeep Pathak (Through V.C) along with Adhik Kadam i/b. Sughandhi B. Deshmukh for Respondent present in the Court.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATED : 25 JANUARY 2024
P.C.:
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
1
Amol D. Nawale
Smt. Housabai Laxman Tathe And Ors
Sou. Sushilabai Sumanrao Poman
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
