Writ petition against ECGC Limited withdrawn by the petitioners after noting that the original proceedings stood disposed of during pendency; the court disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KVM
1/1
7 - WP 13274 OF 2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
KANCHAN Digitally signed byKANCHAN VINOD VINODMAYEKAR MAYEKARDate: 2024.01.2917:36:53 +0530
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 13274 OF 2017
Suresh Thomas & Anr.
….. Petitioners
VERSUS
ECGC Limited
….. Respondents
Ms.Sonam Singh i/b. Mr.Anand Gandhi for the Petitioners.
Mr.Rohaan Cama a/w. Mr.Nabeel Malik, Ms.Adyasha Das i/b. Tuli
& Co. for the Respondents.
CORAM: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 25 JANUARY, 2024
P.C. :-
Ms. Singh, learned counsel i/b. Advocate Mr.Anand Gandhi,
on instructions of the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the writ
petition.
2. She further submits that the original proceedings have been
disposed of during the pendency of this petition.
3. Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]
Suresh Thomas
Anr.
ECGC Limited
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court