Partly allowed

Marie Joseph Faria D/O Late Frant Oliveira Jr and Ors. v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and Ors.

Bombay HC25 Jan 2024WP/4686/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed the petitioner to withdraw Writ Petition No.4686 of 2023 with liberty to file a revision under Section 42 of the Presidential Small Causes Act 1882. The withdrawal was granted to bypass procedural objections regarding maintainability.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a revision under Section 42 of the Presidential Small Causes Act 1882 within one week.

Marie Joseph Faria D/O Late Frant Oliveira Jr and Ors… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

913-WP-4686-2023.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.4686 OF 2023

¶4

SHARADA RANGNATH

¶5

WAHULE

¶6

Digitally signed by SHARADA RANGNATH WAHULE Date: 2024.01.25 19:58:51 +0530

¶7

WITH

¶8

INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO.32651 OF 2023

¶9

Marie Joseph Faria D/o Late Frank Oliveira JR & Ors. … Petitioners

¶10

V/s.

¶11

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd & Ors.

¶12

… Respondents

¶13

WITH

¶14

WRIT PETITION NO.10103 OF 2023

¶15

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited Formerly Known As Burmah Shell Oil Storage And Distribution Co. & Ors … Petitioners

¶16

V/s.

¶17

Marie Joseph Faria D/o Late Frank Oliveira & Ors. … Respondents

¶18

Mr. Nursat Shah a/w. Ema Almeida, Kevin Gala, Archana Jha & Mr. Anil Rai i.b Samma Shah, Advocate for the Petitioner in WP/4686/2023 & for Respondent No.1 in WP/10103/2023. Mr. P. S. Dani Senior Advocate a/w Mr. S. R. Page, Eesha J. & Adv. Ruchi Umrotkar for Respondents in WP/4686/2023 & for Petitioner in WP/10103/2023.

¶19

Mr. C. D. Mali – APP for the Respondent-State

¶20

¶21

CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

¶22

DATED : 25 JANUARY 2024

Sharada

913-WP-4686-2023.doc

P.C.:

WRIT PETITION NO.4686 OF 2023

¶28

Mr. Dani Senior Counsel appearing for the Respondents have raised a preliminary objection about maintainability of this Writ Petition.

¶29

Mr. Dani submits that the impugned order has been challenged by the petitioners by Writ Petition when the Revision could have been filed before the Appellate Bench of the Small Causes Court.

¶30

Mr. Dani has referred the full bench judgment of this Court Bhartiben Shah Vs. Gracy Thomas reported in 2013(2) Bom C.R.1.

¶31

Mr. Nursat Shah appearing for the petitioner seeks leave of the court to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to file a Revision under Section 42 of the Presidential Small Causes Act 1882 before the Appellate Bench of Court of Small Causes, at Mumbai. He further sought exclusion of time period from filing of the present Writ Petition till today. This said period should be excluded while calculating the limitation period.

¶32

Leave with liberty, as prayed for, is granted. Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file the Revision under Section 42 before the Court of Small Causes. Since this Court has not dealt with the merits of the matter, all contentions of parties are kept open.

¶33

If the revision is filed by the petitioner within a period of one week from today, the same will be decided by the Appellate Bench

Sharada

913-WP-4686-2023.doc

of Small Causes court as expeditiously as possible and will try to make an endavour to dispose of the same within a period of six weeks from today.

¶38

All parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order.

¶39

WRIT PETITION NO.10103 OF 2023

¶40

Stand over to 8 February 2024 under the caption ‘for admission’.

¶41

Ad-interim relief, if any, to continue till the next date of the hearing.

¶42

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)

¶43

¶44

Sharada

Marie Joseph Faria D/O Late Frant Oliveira Jr and Ors. v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Marie Joseph Faria D/O Late Frant Oliveira Jr and Ors. v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nargis Majid Oomerbhoy and Anr. Vs Farida Areshi Irani and Ors.

Mr. Sukhbir Singh T. Anand Vs Mr. Bharat Lalji Savla and Ors.

Mahadev Shrirang Ghadage vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Smt.Housabai Laxman Tathe and Ors. Vs Sou.Sushilabai Sumanrao Poman

Suresh Thomas and Ors. Vs Ecgc Ltd.

Suresh Thomas and Anr. Vs Ecgc Ltd.