Pruthviraj Sahebrao Jachak v. State of Maharashtra Thr Department of Co. Operation Marketing and Textile and Ors.

Bombay HC30 May 2024WP/6526/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners challenged rejection of their objections to voter list inclusions for a cooperative sugar factory election. The court found arguable points requiring detailed hearing and adjourned the matters, postponing declaration of the election program until the next hearing date.

What did the court decide?

Hearing adjourned to 11.06.2024; declaration of election program postponed till then.

Pruthviraj Sahebrao Jachak vs State of Maharashtra Thr… — Election Law | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

12-14 WP-6526-2024.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

(12) WRIT PETITION NO. 6526 OF 2024

¶4

Pruthviraj Sahebrao Jachak …Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Maharashtra and Ors. …Respondents

¶7

AND

¶8

(14) WRIT PETITION NO. 7799 OF 2024

¶9

Sambhaji Shivaji Kate …Petitioner

¶10

Versus

¶11

State of Maharashtra and Ors. …Respondents

¶12

¶13

Mr. Chetan Patil a/w. Mr. Shantanu Patil, for Petitioner in WP/7779/2024.

¶14

Mr. S.S. Patwardhan a/w. Mr. Mandar G. Bagkar, for Petitioner in WP/6526/2024.

¶15

Mr. P.P. Kakade, G.P. a/w. Mr. Y.D. Patil, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 in both Writ Petitions.

¶16

Mr. Deelip Bankar, Chief Standing Counsel SCEA a/w. Ms. Pooja Deelip Patil, for Respondent Nos. 3 & 4 in both Writ Petitions. Mr. Shekhar Jagtap a/w. Ishan Paradkar, Ms. Sairuchita Chowdhary and Meghna Gawlani i/b. J. Shekhar Associatrs, for Respondent No. 5 in both Writ Petitions.

¶17

¶18

Digitally signed HUSENBASHARAHAMANNADAF byHUSENBASHARAHAMANNADAFDate: 2024.05.30 18:13:15 +0530

¶19

CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J.

¶20

DATED : 30 MAY 2024 (VACATION COURT)

¶21

P.C. :

¶22

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶23

Husen

¶24

Page 1 of 3

¶25

12-14 WP-6526-2024.doc

¶26

In both the petitions, orders passed by Respondent No.3 - District Co-operative Election Officer dated 08.04.2024 on objections raised by these Petitioners were rejected. Broadly stated, the objections were in respect of inclusion of names of voters in the final voters list on the grounds that, either they are defaulters in payment of increased share-money or that they are defaulters in payments towards purchase of seeds and fertilizer or on the ground that they are not really such members who are supplying sugarcane to the Respondent No. 5 - Shri Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., Bhavaninagar, Taluka Indapur, District Pune.

¶27

Learned counsel for the Respondent - Sakhar Karkhana raises preliminary objection about maintainability of these petitions.

¶28

Learned counsel for the Petitioners invited this Court’s attention to order dated 22.05.2024 passed by Respondent No. 3 – Election Officer, under which it is notified that the final voters list of Respondent - Sakhar Karkhana is published on 24.05.2024. He submitted that since the time to declare election program is limited under Rule 18, the petitions are urgently moved.

¶29

Perused the impugned orders. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Petitioners as well as learned counsel for the Respondents including Sakhar Karkhana, the Election Authority and the Respondent-State, in my view, detail hearing is necessary, as arguable points are raised about whether the impugned orders are passed in accordance with law.

¶30

The date of publication of final voters list is 24.05.2024 and

¶31

Page 2 of 3

¶32

Husen

¶33

12-14 WP-6526-2024.doc

¶34

under Rule 18 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies (Election to Committee) Rules, 2014, the period of 20 days within which an election program will have to be declared in accordance with law, is ending on 13.06.2024 , not excluding the last day.

¶35

In that view of the matter, place the matters for further hearing on 11.06.2024 before the regular Court. Declaration of election program is postponed till the next date.

¶36

This order is passed without prejudice to the rights and contentions of both the sides, including about maintainability of the petitions as well as on merits.

¶37

All concerned to act on duly authenticated or digitally signed copy of this order.

¶38

(M.M. SATHAYE, J.)

¶39

Page 3 of 3

¶40

Husen

Pruthviraj Sahebrao Jachak v. State of Maharashtra Thr Department of Co. Operation Marketing and Textile and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pruthviraj Sahebrao Jachak v. State of Maharashtra Thr Department of Co. Operation Marketing and Textile and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Thr Asst. Commissioner 'L' Ward vs Gaurav Gadkari and Anr.

Mehrunnisa Abdul Ajij Khan vs the Competent Authority Konkan Division Mumbai and Ors.

Rafik Hasham Mulla vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Shaikh Tajuddin Lal Mohammad vs Mhada through Its Chief Officer

Sambhaji Shivaji Kate vs State of Maharashtra Thr Department of Co. Operation and Ors.

Pravin Bhanji Patel vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.