A writ petition moved by MHADA praying for extension of time to decide petitioner's eligibility was disposed of by the court, which held that no such application was filed.
The praecipe seeking extension of time was dismissed as no such application was filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6 wp 1761-24 .doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1761 OF 2024
Shaikh Tajuddin Lal Mohammad ...Petitioner Versus MHADA Through Its Chief Officer and Ors. ...Respondent
Mr. Yousuf Khan (via V.C.) for the Petitioner.
Ms. Aparna Karathil i/b P.G. Lad for the Respondent No.1 to 4 (MHADA).
SNEHA NITIN CHAVAN
Ms. Jyoti Chavan, Addl. G.P. (via V.C.) for the Respondent No.5/State.
Digitally signed by SNEHA NITIN CHAVAN Date: 2024.05.30 17:29:13 +0530
CORAM : M.M.SATHAYE, J. DATE : 30th MAY 2024 (VACATION COURT)
P.C. :
page 1 /2
Sneha Chavan
6 wp 1761-24 .doc
[M.M.SATHAYE,J.]
page 2 /2
Sneha Chavan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an extension of time sought by the respondent is to be allowed in absence of a filed application.
Shaikh Tajuddin Lal Mohammad
MHADA
M.M. Sathaye
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
