Petitioners had already filed a pending revision against the impugned order before the Hon'ble Minister. Holding that a party cannot challenge the same order before two forums, the High Court disposed of the writ petition; the interim application also stood disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
906-wp-6524-2024.doc
Shubhada S Kadam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 6524 of 2024
Santosh Dattatray Sawant and ors.
… Petitioners
versus
Honourable Minister, Cooperation and ors.
…. Respondents
Mr. Sandip G. Rane, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. Y. D. Patil, AGP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 7th AUGUST, 2024.
P.C. :
of 2014 will not survive for consideration and same is also disposed of.
SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM
(R. M. JOSHI, J.)
Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date: 2024.08.08 15:28:02 +0530
1/1
Santosh Dattatray Sawant and ors.
Honourable Minister, Cooperation and ors.
R. M. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
