Mohammed Islam @ Babbu @ Shahrukh Gulam Husain Indreshi v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim application in an appeal was adjourned at the request of the applicant's counsel to a later date.
What the court decided
Board Sr.No.:-10
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 243 OF 2024
In
CR. APPEAL 436 OF 2024
Mohammed Islam @ Babbu @ Shahrukh Gulam....PETITIONER Husain Indreshi
V/S
State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT
Mr. Tohid Shaikh i/b Ms. Anjali Patil, Advocate for the Applicant.
Ms. R. D. Humane, APP for the Respondent - State. Adv. Dhanashree Bhate i/b Sagar S. Ambedkar, for Respondent - 2.
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE J DATE : 11th November, 2024
P.C. :
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mohammed Islam @ Babbu @ Shahrukh Gulam Husain Indreshi
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
Coram
M. M. Sathaye
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
22 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Sulabai Sopan Nevale and Ors. vs Subhash Maruti Gholap Since Deceased Throu. Legal Heir and Anr.
Anwar Hussain Shaikh S/O Hussain Shaikh vs Sanjeev Sitaram Jadhav
Pritam Vinayak Patil and Anr. vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bharmu Subrao Patil the President , Sharada Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Yashwantnagar and Anr. vs Shri. Arrjun Bharmu Pituk and Anr.