The High Court of Bombay disposed of an interlocutory writ petition keeping liberty open. Petitioner is Sindhudurg District Central Co-op. Bank Ltd vs. Sadanand Rajaram Mayekar.
Writ petition disposed, liberty kept open, no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4-wp-13975-2022.doc
Nikita
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.13975 OF 2022
NIKITA KAILAS DARADE
Digitally signed byNIKITA KAILAS DARADE Date: 2024.02.01 17:14:50 +0530
Sindhudurg District Central Co-op. Bank
Ltd Thr. Chief Executive Officer… Petitioner
V/s.
Sadanand Rajaram Mayekar… Respondent
Mr. Vijay Vaidya a/w Mr. Mahendra Agvekar a/w
Ms. Shraddha Chavan for the Petitioner.
CORAM :AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED:FEBRUARY 1, 2024
P.C.:
1. The order passed in the petition is interlocutory in nature capable of being challenged in an appeal or revision in case the final decision Trial Court goes against the petitioner.
2.Keeping the said liberty open, the writ petition is disposed of.
No costs.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
Sindhudurg District Central Co-op. Bank Ltd
Sadanand Rajaram Mayekar
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court