Petition challenging the validity of a caste certificate. The Vigilance Cell supported the petitioner's genes, but the Scrutiny Committee discarded the same. The High Court issued notice for final disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
42-WP-6066-24.od t
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO.6066 OF 2024
Dhanraj S/o Sakharam Bhowre, Tq. Arvi, Dist. Wardha
-vs-
District Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Wardha and ors.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and the Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Shri Ram Karode, Advocate for petitioner. Shri H. D. Marathe, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND MRS VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : November 11, 2024
(Mrs Vrushali V. Joshi, J.) (Nitin W. Sambre, J.)
Asmita
Signed by: Smt. Asmita A. Bhandakkar Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 11/11/2024 17:43:18
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Scrutiny Committee acted without basis in discarding the Vigilance Cell's support for the petitioner's caste certificate?
Dhanraj S/o Sakharam Bhowre
District Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Wardha
Nitin W. Sambre
Vrushali V. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
