This is an adjournment order only. Time of two weeks was granted as last chance at the request of counsel for respondent no. 4, and the writ petition was listed for further consideration on November 11, 2024. No substantive issue was decided and nothing of general application arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP2875-24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 2875/2024
(VAISHALI RAJKUMAR YERME & OTHERS VERSUS ZILLA PARISHAD, GADCHIROLI &
OTHERS)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.
Shri M.I. Dhatrak, counsel for the petitioners. Shri M.L. Vairagade, counsel for the respondent nos.1 to 3. Shri V.N. Morande, counsel for the respondent no.4.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 14, 2024
P. C.
At the request of the counsel appearing for the respondent no.4, we grant time of two weeks by way of last chance.
(MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.)
(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
APTE
Signed by: Apte Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 16/10/2024 11:48:16
VAISHALI RAJKUMAR YERME & OTHERS
ZILLA PARISHAD, GADCHIROLI
RESPONDENT NOS. 2 AND 3 (NOT INDIVIDUALLY NAMED)
RESPONDENT NO. 4 (NOT INDIVIDUALLY NAMED)
NITIN W. SAMBRE
VRUSHALI V. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
