Balkrishna Ranvijay Jaiswal v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner charge-sheeted under IPC Sections 363, 366(A), 376 and Section 4 POCSO Act sought quashing; the now-major victim stated she did not wish to proceed. The High Court kept the petition pending since the issue of quashing POCSO proceedings with victim consent is before the Apex Court and deferred trial.
What did the court decide?
Trial court requested to defer trial beyond 18 June 2024
What the court decided
510-WP-588-2024.odt
Digitally signed by KANCHAN KANCHAN PRASHANT PRASHANT DHURI DHURI Date: 2024.02.23 14:24:02 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 588 OF 2024
Balkrishna Ranvijay Jaiswal … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another … Respondents
Mr. Harikrishna Mishra instructed by Mr. Mukesh Gupta for the Petitioner.
Ms. K.T. Hivarale, APP for the State.
Mr. Dhruv Gupta instructed by Ms. Anita Pandey for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK & N.R. BORKAR, JJ. DATED : 22nd FEBRUARY 2024
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Balkrishna Ranvijay Jaiswal
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Prakash D. Naik
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court