Rahul Gomes v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition seeking quashing of an FIR alleging false claims for bills paid by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The court allowed the petitioner to implead the Commissioner, MCGM as a respondent and issued notice returnable on a later date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
40-WP-2283-24.odt
1 / 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2283 OF 2024
Rahul Gomes .... Petitioner
versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents
- Mr. Shirish Gupte, Senior Advocate a/w Amar Gahlot a/w Nalin Bajaj i/b. Aishwarya Pawar, Advocate for Petitioner.
- Smt. Anamika Malhotra, APP for the State/Respondent.
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL & DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 27th NOVEMBER, 2024
P.C. :
- The Petitioner seeks quashing of the C.R.No.4/2024
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rahul Gomes
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
SARANG V. KOTWAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court