Sham Prabhakar Ghorpade v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench; judges Mangesh S. Patil and Shailesh P. Brahmе; dated 03.10.2024; 'paucity of time' adjournment order covering dozens of Writ Petitions (Nos. 8023/2019, 8148/2020, 1751/2021, 9844/2022, 1006/2023, 1382/2023, 6091/6093/6100/6111/6114/2023, 6470/2023, 7468/2023, 8736/2023, 8970/8974/8992/2023, 58/2024, 703/2024, 6927/6928-series and others through 3091/2024) plus CA/8708/2024, CA/10680/2024, CA/1307/2024 and Family Court Appeals 23/2021, 55/2024, 50/2017 and 51/2017 (with CAs 10322/2018, 5838/2013, 10321/2018); fresh dates assigned cluster-wise between 19.11.2024 and 18.12.2024; several matters marked '(in urgent category)'; interim relief/undertakings/statements expressly directed to continue till next date; no parties, advocates, statutes or precedents named.
What did the court decide?
All listed matters adjourned to fresh dates between 19.11.2024 and 18.12.2024; interim relief/undertaking/statement, if any, ordered to continue till the next date.