Limbaji Nana Khedkar v. the State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Batch 'paucity of time' adjournment order issued by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, dated 03.10.2024, Coram: Mangesh S. Patil and Shailesh P. Brahme, JJ. Adjourns dozens of individually numbered matters — chiefly Writ Petitions (e.g. Nos. 8023/2019, 1751/2021, 1006/2023, 1382/2023, 3091/2024 through 9673/2024, and older items such as 1466/2007 and 3957/2010) and four Family Court Appeals (Nos. 23/2021, 55/2024, 50/2017 and 51/2017) with related civil applications — to hearing dates running from 19.11.2024 to 18.12.2024, many entries marked '(in urgent category)'; interim relief/undertakings/statements are directed to continue till the next date. The order names no parties, cites no statutes or precedents, and records no substantive holdings; it is useful only for scheduling and cause-list tracking.
What did the court decide?
Any interim relief/undertaking/statement existing in the listed matters shall continue till the next hearing date; all listed matters are adjourned to the dates set against them.