Petitioners with GNM qualification sought appointment treating them as ANM-qualified. The court noted GNM is a higher qualification than ANM and cited an Apex Court precedent supporting the presumption, then adjourned the matter pending government clarification and affidavit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp5620.24.odt 1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .
WRIT PETITION No.5620 OF 2024
(Kiran Ganesh Waghmare and others Vs. The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Department of Public Health, Mumbai and others)
Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram,__________________________________________________________________________ appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
Mr. S.S. Dhengale, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. N.S. Rao, AGP for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. U.J. Deshpande, Advocate for respondent No.5.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 24th OCTOBER, 2024.
wp5620.24.odt 2/2
principle which is laid down by the Apex Court.
(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
Wadode
Signed by: Mr. Devendra Wadode Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 25/10/2024 12:56:55
1 issue framed by the court
Whether GNM-qualified candidates can be presumed to hold the ANM qualification for recruitment purposes.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jyoti K.K. Vs. Kerala Public Service CommissionReferred¶4
AIRONLINE 2002 SC 320 :: 2002 UJ(SC) 2 941
Kiran Ganesh Waghmare
The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Department of Public Health, Mumbai
NITIN W. SAMBRE
VRUSHALI V. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
