Ku. Payal Mahendra Gajbe v. the S.T. Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur, Thr. Member Secretary and Ors.

Bombay HC10 Sept 2024WP/5388/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A student whose tribe caste certificate was invalidated sought protection as her engineering admission deadline had lapsed. The Court granted an interim extension of time to produce the caste validity certificate until the next hearing, subject to statutory provisions and precedent.

What did the court decide?

Time to produce caste validity certificate extended till next hearing (24 September 2024), conditional on admission not already cancelled.

Ku. Payal Mahendra Gajbe vs the S.T. Certificate… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

1009wp5388.24

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.5388 OF 2024

¶6

Ku. Payal Mahendra Gajbe ... Petitioner

¶7

Versus -

¶8

The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur and others ... Respondents

¶9

Shri N.D. Jambhule, Advocate for Petitioner.

¶10

Ms. P.C. Bavankule, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent No.1.

¶11

Ms. Kirti Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent No.3.

¶12

CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ.

¶13

DATE : 10 SEPTEMBER 2024

¶14

P.C. :

¶15

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

¶16

The Petitioner is a student. The caste certificate of the Petitioner is invalidated by the impugned order. The Petitioner

¶17

¶18

1009wp5388.24

¶19

required caste validity certificate for admission in the Engineering Course and she had to produce the caste validity certificate by 9 September 2024, failing which her admission would be cancelled.

¶20

Shri Jambhule, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, asserts that though the time limit has expired, in actuality, the admission of the Petitioner is not cancelled as of date.

¶21

We note that the impugned order of invalidation of caste certificate of the Petitioner was passed few days before the deadline for submission of caste validity certificate because of which, the petitioner had to rush to this Court for seeking protective order. As regards merits of the case of the Petitioner, same will have to be examined, for which the learned Assistant Government Pleader will have to be given time to call for the record. In view of this position, we are left with no option, but to consider grant of protective order till the matter is decided on merits.

¶22

Shri Jambhule, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, states that the Petitioner’s father Mahendra has been given caste validity certificate, which is as on date not cancelled. Therefore, prima facie, an arguable case is made out. In case the Petitioner’s admission is not yet cancelled as on today, then we extend the time granted to the Petitioner to produce the caste validity

¶23

3 1009wp5388.24

¶24

certificate till the next date of hearing. We make it clear that this extension will not create any equity and the Petitioner would be bound by Section 10 of the Maharashtra Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes (Vimukta Jati), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of issuance and verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000 and the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Chairman and Managing Director, Food Corporation of India and others Vs. Jagdish Balaram Bahira and others¹ .

¶25

Put up this petition on board on 24 September 2024.

¶26

(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)

¶27

khj

¶28

1 (2017) 8 SCC 679

¶29

Signed by: Kamal H. Jeswani Designation: Additional Secretary Date: 10/09/2024 18:49:08

Ku. Payal Mahendra Gajbe v. the S.T. Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur, Thr. Member Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ku. Payal Mahendra Gajbe v. the S.T. Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur, Thr. Member Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Kusum Sitaram Raut and Others vs State of Maha., Thr. Secy., Social Justice and Special Assistance Dpet., Mumbai and Ors.

Abdul Saleem Abdul Razzaque vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, General Administration Department, Mumbai and Others

Sanjay S/O Laxman Dandare vs Maha. State Electricity Transmission Comp. Ltd. Thr. Chairman-Cum Managing Director, Mumbai and Ors.

Mahesh S/O. Vinod Parate vs the S.T. Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Thr. Member Secy. and Dy. Director and Ors.

Yash S/O. Nishikant Nande (Minor) Thr. His Natural Guardian Father Nishikant S. Nande vs State of Maha., Thr. Dept. of Social Justice and Special Assistance and Anr.

Rahul Vyayam Prasarak Mandal, Thr. Chairman, Shri Jaykumar Abhyankar, Amravati and Others vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Department of School Education, Mumbai and Others