Disposed

Bhaurao Mahadev Badole and Others v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary Social Welfare Department, Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC24 Jan 2024WP/559/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought a second benefit under the Assured Career Progression Scheme as per Government Resolution dated 02.03.2019, having already received the first benefit. The Court directed respondents to examine their entitlement and eligibility within eight weeks and release benefits if found entitled.

What the court decided

AI extract

Bhaurao Mahadev Badole and Others vs the State of… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:11694-DB

¶2

904-WP-559-2024.odt 1

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.559 of 2024

¶5

Bhaurao Mahadev Badole and others … Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra, and others. .. Respondents.

¶6

Mr. P. S. Kshirsagar, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. A.S.Fulzele, Additional Government Pleader for respondent nos. 1 to 4

¶7

CORAM :- NITIN W. SAMBRE AND MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 17^th OCTOBER, 2024

¶8

P. C.

¶9

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶10

The petitioners seek second benefit under the Assured Career Progression scheme in terms of the Government Resolution dated 02.03.2019.

¶11

The petitioners seek to rely upon the orders dated 21.09.2013 passed in Writ Petition No.7358/2013( (Kiran Namdeo Shinde and ors vs. State of Maharashtra and others) with connected writ petitions and dated 02.12.2013 passed in Writ Petition 7256/2011 (Sunil T. Ukande and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. with connected writ petition. Undisputedly, the petitioners have received the first benefit in terms of the said scheme.

¶12

It is to be noted that in the meanwhile, vide Government Resolution dated 02.03.2019 the Assured Career Progression Scheme has been modified. The benefit of Assured Career Progression Scheme under the recommendations of the Seventh Pay Commission is admissible after a period of 10/20/30 years of service. The Scheme has been made applicable from 01.01.2016.

¶13

904-WP-559-2024.odt 2

¶14

In view of aforesaid, we find that the following order would serve the interests of justice:

¶15

(i) The respondent nos.3 and 4 shall examine entitlement and eligibility of the petitioners to receive the second benefit under the Assured Career Progression Scheme in the light of the Government Resolution dated 02.03.2019 and other relevant Government Resolutions. The respondent nos.3 and 4 shall consider the aforesaid entitlement within a period of eight weeks of receiving copy of this order. If the petitioners are found entitled to receive such benefit, the same shall be released in their favour within a period of four months of such decision being taken.

¶16

Rule stands disposed of in aforesaid terms with no order as to costs.

¶17

(VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

¶18

Andurkar..

¶19

Signed by: Jayant S. Andurkar Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 18/10/2024 10:27:05

Bhaurao Mahadev Badole and Others v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary Social Welfare Department, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Bhaurao Mahadev Badole and Others v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary Social Welfare Department, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Bharat Chandusingh Chavhan vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Department of Education, Mumbai and Others

Roshan S/O Ramdas Thakre vs State of Mah. Thr. Its Secretary Home Dept. Mantralaya Mumbai 32 and 2 Others

M/S. Mov Controls and Instruments, Thr. Proprietor, Arvindkumar Tukaram Subbanwar vs State of Maha., in the Ministry and Forest, Thr. Additional Chief Secy. Dr. Rajagopal Devara and or

Tushar S/O Sanjay Sultane vs State of Maha., Revenue and Forest Dept., Mumbai Thr. Its Secretary and Ors.

Roshan S/O Ramdas Thakre vs State of Mah. Thr. Its Secretary Home Dept. Mantralaya Mumbai 32 and 2 Others

Rahul S/O Subhash Barbole. vs the State of Mah. Thr. Its Secretary, Dept. of Home Mantralaya, Mumbai -32 and Others