Petitioner, an office bearer of a Society, sought directions to respondent no.5, an employee of the Management, to produce Society documents and muster roll allegedly taken away. Court heard counsel on whether writ jurisdiction can issue directions to a private individual and adjourned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
31-WP-1672-2024.odt 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 1672 of 2024
Bharat Chandusingh Chavhan
vs.
State of Maharashtra and others.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Ms K. M. Shekhar, Advocate for petitioner. Mr Hrishikesh Marathe, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos. 1 & 2.
CORAM :- NITIN W. SAMBRE AND MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 25th NOVEMBER, 2024
Heard.
(VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
Signed by: Jayant S. Andurkar Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Andurkar. Date: 25/11/2024 16:28:36
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ can be issued against a private individual (respondent no.5) to produce Society documents including the muster roll.
Bharat Chandusingh Chavhan
State of Maharashtra
Respondent no.5
Nitin W. Sambre
Vrushali V. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
