The petitioner agreed to pay Rs. 20,000 per month as decreetal amount. The impugned order was quashed and the petition disposed of with the undertaking accepted.
Impugned order quashed; petitioner to pay Rs. 20,000 per month
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4-wp-5463-24.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Writ Petition (WP) No. 5463 of 2024
Shailendra S/o Mohanlal Choudhary
Versus
Sangita W/o Dilip Kukde
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Shri V.V.Bhangde, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.N.Upadhyay, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM : N.R.BORKAR, J. DATED : 21st OCTOBER, 2024.
The learned counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent is willing to accept the decreetal amount as per the schedule mentioned in the affidavit dated 18th September, 2024 filed by the petitioner with only modification in respect of monthly payment. It is submitted that petitioner instead of Rs.15,000/- per month as mentioned in the affidavit be directed to pay Rs.20,000/- per month.
SKNair
2 4-wp-5463-24.odt
SKNair
Shailendra S/o Mohanlal Choudhary
Sangita W/o Dilip Kukde
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
