Writ petition challenging provident fund proceedings was disposed of as the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, earlier non-functional, is now operational; interim protection against coercive action continues until the Tribunal decides the Section 7-O application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 5-wp-1265-22.odt
2024:BHC-NAG:14123
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Writ Petition (WP) No. 1265 of 2022 M/s Mohit Industries, Akola
Versus
The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Akola
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order
Coram, appearances, Court's Orders
or directions and Registrar's order
Shri A.J.Pathak, Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri H.N.Verma, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM : N.R.BORKAR, J. DATED : 21st OCTOBER, 2024.
This petition was filed as at the relevant time
the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal was not functional.
terms.
SKNair
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Mohit Industries, Akola
The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Akola
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
