The High Court refused to entertain a writ petition challenging an interim order by the State Government staying an order made under Section 39 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act.
Writ petition dismissed. Directing State Government to decide appeal within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 2 24.wp6311.2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 6311 OF 2024
Ashok s/o Markandi Marganwar
Vs.
Hon’ble Minister, Rural Development, Government of Maharashtra, Mantralaya, Mumbai and Ors.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. S.S. Shingane, Advocate for petitioner. Ms. P.C. Bawankule, AGP for respondent Nos.1 & 2/State. Mr. Rishi Morkhede, Advocate h/f Mr. Rajendra D. Murkute, Advocate for respondent No.7/caveator.
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 19.10.2024.
This petition takes exception to the interim order dated 09.10.2024 passed by the State Government in Appeal VPA No.2024/Case No.34/44/PR-6.
Prity
2 / 2 24.wp6311.2024
(N.R. BORKAR, J.)
Prity
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the interim order passed by the State Government stayed under Section 39 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act should be entertained via writ petition.
Whether the State Government has violated audi alteram partem by passing the stayed order without hearing the petitioner.
Ashok s/o Markandi Marganwar
Hon’ble Minister, Rural Development, Government of Maharashtra
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
