Exhibit-5. It is stated at the bar by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Exhibit-5 has thereafter being not pressed by the learned counsel for the original disputant. The challenge is to this order dated 18.11.2019 by the petitioner has been rejected by Judgment dated 09.08.2020, wherein is has been opined that upon a preliminary inquiry, the learned Appellate Court was of the opinion that it was not a fit case in which, a compliant should be lodged under Section 340 of the Cr.P.C. as prima facie there was no material to indicate that disputant had committed an offence under Section 195 of Cr.P.C. in judicial proceedings before the Co-operative Court by making false statement on oath (Page81). The question, as to whether indeed, a false statement on oath has been made or not is for the learned Co-operative Court to decide based upon the material produced before it. When it opines, that the material produced before it would require evidence to be recorded, that is an opinion rendered by the Court of first instance, which has been confirmed by the Appellate Court, which finding, ought not be interfered by this Court, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. In that view of matter, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order of the Co-
