The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an order where the trial court rejected an application to admit documents as evidence, finding the trial court's observations non-perverse.
The writ petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:14120 1 wp 5418.24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Writ Petition No.5418/2024 (Dipak and others V Mustafa)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
CORAM : N.R. Borkar, J. DATE : 22-10-2024.
This petition takes exception to the order dated 06-07-2024 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Warora below Exhibit-207 in Regular Civil Suit No.72/2015.
ii. Respondent herein has filed the above suit for injunction against the present petitioners. By the impugned order, the learned trial Court has rejected the application filed by the present petitioners to admit certain documents filed by them on record in evidence and mark them exhibit.
iii. I have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and perused the impugned order.
iv. The learned trial Court has observed that on the basis of evidence led, the documents in question cannot be
2 wp 5418.24.odt
said to be proved and petitioners are not interested in
examining the concerned witnesses to prove the said documents.
v. The above finding recorded by the learned trial Court is not shown to be perverse. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order.
vi. The petition is dismissed. However, it would be open to the petitioners to examine the concerned witness to prove the documents in question.
( N.R. Borkar, J. )
Deshmukh
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the trial court's order rejecting the petitioners' application to admit documents in evidence.
Whether the trial court's finding that the petitioners are not interested in examining witnesses is perverse.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dipak and others
Mustafa
N.R. Borkar, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
