Writ petition concerning a clause-16 amendment arbitration matter; petitioner made no efforts to pursue it, respondent had died with legal heirs on record, and the petition was dismissed for lack of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
908.wp.4636.2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Writ Petition NO. 4636 OF 2017
The Union Of India And Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Zubaidabai Bandukwala Fidaally Potia ...Respondent
None for the Petitioners. Mr. Javed Khan for Respondent.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATED : 6 FEBRUARY 2024
P.C.:
1
Amol D. Nawale
908.wp.4636.2017.doc
none appeared for the Petitioner. Hence, even today when the matter was called, none appeared for the Petitioner.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
2
Amol D. Nawale
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should proceed after the sole respondent's death and absence of petitioner's steps to circulate the matter.
The Union Of India And Ors.
Zubaidabai Bandukwala Fidaally Potia
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
