Disposed

Mr. Vasant Bhairu Mate and Anr. v. Shri. Rajendra Prabhakar Kudtarkar

Bombay HC6 Feb 2024WP/13266/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition settled amicably between the parties for Rs.13 Lakhs deposited in court against the respondent's claims over suit premises, with agreed cancellation of a power of attorney and agreements. On counsel's statement that the final compliance direction was met, the court disposed of the writ petition and connected civil application.

What the court decided

AI extract

Mr. Vasant Bhairu Mate and Anr. Vs Shri. Rajendra… — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

27.13266.2018.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 13266 OF 2018 WITH

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1147 OF 2019

¶5

Mr. Vasant Bhairu Mate And Anr. ...Petitioners Versus Shri. Rajendra Prabhakar Kudtarkar ...Respondent

¶6

Mr. Somnath Thengal i/b. R. M. Haridas for the Petitioner.

¶7

CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

¶8

DATED : 6 FEBRUARY 2024

¶9

P.C.:

¶10

Mr. Thengal submits that by an order dated 27 April 2019, it was recorded that the parties have decided to settle the entire controversy between themselves amicably. The order dated 22 April 2019 passed in the present Writ Petition is reproduced herein below :-

¶11

“1. Heard Mr.R.M. Haridas, learned Counsel for the petitioners.

¶12

The petition was heard on 7.2.2019. In paragraph-5 of that order it was recorded that the parties have decided to settle the entire controversy between themselves amicably. The respondent agreed to accept Rs.13 Lakhs as and by way of full and final settlement of his claims in respect of the suit premises. The respondent also agreed to cancel Power of Attorney as also agreement for sale dated 20.6.2007 and leave and

Amol D. Nawale

27.13266.2018.doc

licence agreement dated 12.6.2008. The petitioners agreed to deposit Rs.13 Lakhs in this Court within six months in the following manner : [a] The petitioners will deposit Rs.2,00,000/- within one month from 7th February, 2019 i.e on or before 7^th March, 2019.

¶17

[b] The petitioners will further deposit Rs.2,00,000/- within one month from 7th March, 2019 i.e on or before 8th April, 2019.(7th April-Sunday) [c] The petitioners will further deposit Rs.2,00,000/- within one month from 8th April, 2019 i.e on or before 8th May, 2019. [d] The petitioners will further deposit Rs.2,00,000/within one month from 8th May, 2019 i.e on or before 10th June, 2019. (9th June-Sunday) [e] The petitioners will further deposit Rs.2,00,000/- within one month from 10th June, 2019 i.e on or before 10th July, 2019. [f] The petitioners will deposit remaining Rs.3,00,000/- within one month from 10th July, 2019 i.e on or before 13th August, 2019.

¶18

Mr. Haridas states that the petitioners have deposited Rs.2 Lakhs within the stipulated time. The petitioners have, however, not complied clause [b] of paragraph-5 by depositing Rs.2 Lakhs on or before 8.4.2019. He assures that he will bring Demand Draft for showing compliance of clause [b] of paragraph-5 of the order dated 7.2.2019. 4. In view thereof, list the petition on 02.05.2019 in the Supplementary Board.”

¶19

Mr. Thengal submits that his client has complied the direction given in order dated 22 April 2019.

¶20

In view of the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Consequently, Civil Application/Interim Application stands disposed of.

¶21

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)

¶22

¶23

Amol D. Nawale

Mr. Vasant Bhairu Mate and Anr. v. Shri. Rajendra Prabhakar Kudtarkar

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Mr. Vasant Bhairu Mate and Anr. v. Shri. Rajendra Prabhakar Kudtarkar

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nikhil Bhanudas Shelar vs the State of Maharashtra

Mr. Vijay Kumar Gupta Vs Geeta Vijay Gupta

Kirtikumar B. Bhatt Vs Smt. Chandraben K. Bhatt

Kasturi Ramchandra Tayade and Ors. Vs Mahendra P. Sadh and Ors.

Sumer Buildcorp Pvt. Ltd., (Previously M/S. Sumer Associates) Vs Arun Tukaram Kadam and Ors.

The Union of India and Ors. Vs Zubaidabai Bandukwala Fidaally Potia