A contempt petition was disposed of as not pressed after the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the client had received possession of the shop and would pay the demanded draft amount to the Court Receiver within a week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18.cp.255.2014.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 255 OF 2014
Sumer Buildcorp Pvt. Ltd., (previously M/s. Sumer Associates) ...Petitioner Versus Arun Tukaram Kadam And Ors. ...Respondents
Ms. Bhoomika Lodha for Petitioner. Mr. P. G. Parkar for Respondents.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATED : 6 FEBRUARY 2024
P.C.:
that her client has received the possession of shop. She further submits that her client has prepared Demant Draft of Rs.41,400/in favour of the Court Receiver of the Bombay High Court is ready and she will be paying the said amount to the Court Receiver within a period of one week. Ms. Lodha further submits that she is not pressing for Contempt Petition.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
1
Amol D. Nawale
Sumer Buildcorp Pvt. Ltd.
Arun Tukaram Kadam And Ors.
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
