Writ petition challenging the failure of respondents to extend General Provident Fund benefits to petitioners who were granted approval for the post of Assistant Teacher. Notice issued for final disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 905 wp4574.2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.4574 of 2024
Nasrin Bano Mohammad Sadik and another Vs. State of Maharashtra and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.
Mr.P.B.Patil, Advocate for petitioners.
Mr. A.S.Fulzele, Addl. G.P. for respondent no.1.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE & MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 23, 2024.
been granted approval for the post of Assistant Teacher with the petitioner no.2-Management.
are duty bound to extend the benefit of General Provident Fund for which there is failure on the part of the respondents.
(MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W.SAMBRE, J.)
Mukund Ambulkar
Signed by: Ambulkar (MLA) Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 23/10/2024 17:49:24
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents are duty bound to extend the benefit of General Provident Fund to the petitioners?
Nasrin Bano Mohammad Sadik
Management
State of Maharashtra
others
NITIN W. SAMBRE
VRUSHALI V. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
