Procedural order in a writ petition concerning a caste scrutiny matter. By consent of both sides, the court simply adjourned the matter to 19/08/2024; no substantive ruling was made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3989 OF 2024
In
STAMP NO. OF
Yug S/o Jayesh Chudasama
....PETITIONER
V/S
The District Caste Scrutiny Committee, Amravati Thr. Member/ Secretary, Amravati
....RESPONDENT
VIJAY A KOTHALE for Petitioner
for Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN W. SAMBRE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ
DATE : 5th August, 2024
P.C. :
BY CONSENT S.O. TO 19/08/2024.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL )
Page 1/1
Yug S/o Jayesh Chudasama
The District Caste Scrutiny Committee, Amravati Thr. Member/Secretary, Amravati
NITIN W. SAMBRE
ABHAY J. MANTRI
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
