Petitioners with Architectural Draftsman qualification, claimed equivalent to Civil Draftsman, allege they were wrongly non-suited. Court issued notice for final disposal returnable 30.08.2024; interim appointments made subject to petition outcome.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
919wp4505.24.odt 1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .
WRIT PETITION NO.4505 OF 2024
(Rupchand s/o Mahadeo Itwale and one .vs. The State of Maharashtra and others)
Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions
Court's or Judge's orders.
and Registrar's Orders.
Shri P.R. Sharma, Advocate h/f Shri V.P. Marpakwar, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri H.R. Dhumale, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos.1 and 2.
C ORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. D ATE : 02.08.2024.
Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
Gulande
Signed by: A.S. GULANDE Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 03/08/2024 11:44:00
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioners holding Architectural Draftsman qualification, claimed equivalent to Civil Draftsman, were wrongly excluded?
Rupchand s/o Mahadeo Itwale and one
The State of Maharashtra and others
NITIN W. SAMBRE
ABHAY J. MANTRI
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
