The single judge dismissed three writ petitions as infructuous, noting that the underlying misc. appeals had been disposed of by the appellate court, rendering the challenge to the interim order moot.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17.wp.4388.2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Writ Petition NO. 4388 OF 2017 M/s. Motor And General Stores ...Petitioner Versus M/s. Pinky Enterprises And Ors ...Respondents WITH Writ Petition NO. 4390 OF 2017 M/s. Motor And General Stores ...Petitioner Versus Ameet Lakhani ...Respondent WITH Writ Petition NO. 4389 OF 2017 M/s. Motor And General Stores ...Petitioner Versus Naagraj Ganeshmal Jain And Ors ...Respondents ____________________________________ Dr. Uday P. Warunjikar for the Petitioner. ____________________________________ CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATED : 26 MARCH 2024 P.C.: 1. These writ petitions were filed challenging an ad-
1
ADN
17.wp.4388.2017.doc
interim order passed in Misc. Appeal which was then pending before the Appellate Bench pursuant to the MARJI Application filed in the RAE & R Suit No.591/951/2012.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
2
ADN
M/s. Motor And General Stores
M/s. Pinky Enterprises And Ors
Ameet Lakhani
Naagraj Ganeshmal Jain And Ors
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
