Mr. Nellaiappan S. Pillai and Anr. v. Mrs. Krisshna Arjun and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
OF 2016.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KVM
1/2
904 - WP 1841 OF 2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
KANCHAN Digitally signed byKANCHAN VINOD VINOD MAYEKAR MAYEKAR Date: 2024.03.2716:55:45 +0530
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1841 OF 2016
ALONGWITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1681 OF 2018
ALONGWITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 423 OF 2017
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1841 OF 2016
Nellaiappan S. Pillai & Anr.
….. Petitioners/
Applicants
VERSUS
Krisshna Arjun & Anr.
….. Respondents
Mr. Yogendra Kanchan for the Petitioners/Applicants.
CORAM: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 22 MARCH, 2024
P.C. :-
Mr.Kanchan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners
submits that both the petitioners are present online by V.C.
during the hearing of this civil writ petition. He submits that his
clients have given him instructions to withdraw the writ petition
as his clients have already received the possession of the suit flat.
KVM
2/2
904 - WP 1841 OF 2016.doc
2. Civil writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
3. In sequel, all the civil applications are also disposed of.
[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]
Nellaiappan S. Pillai & Anr.
Krisshna Arjun & Anr.
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court