Disposed

Hemant Keshav Badar v. Rohini Hemant Badar

Bombay HC22 Mar 2024WP/1510/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court disposed of a writ challenge against an interim maintenance order. The Court permitted the wife to withdraw deposited maintenance funds with accrued interest and ordered the Family Court to expedite the main maintenance petition within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

The deposited maintenance amount of Rs. 15,90,000 with accrued interest is allowed to be withdrawn by the Respondent. The impugned order remains in force till the disposal of M.J. Petition No. 2515 of

Hemant Keshav Badar Vs Rohini Hemant Badar — Maintenance and Alimony | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

14-wp1510-23.doc

¶2

vai

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

VASANT Digitally signed byVASANT ANANDRAO ANANDRAO IDHOL Date: 2024.03.28 WRIT PETITION NO.1510 OF 2023 IDHOL 12:05:33 +0530 WITH

¶6

INTERIM APPLICATION (STAMP) NO.8941 OF 2024

¶7

Hemant K. Badar ...Petitioner V/s. Rohini H. Badar ...Respondent

¶8

Ms.Madhavi Tavanandi with Mr.Sanket G. Gaikwad and Ms.Meenal R. Barge for the Petitioner.

¶9

Mr.Ashish R. Kachole i/b Mr.Gaurav for the Respondent.

¶10

CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATE : 22ND MARCH, 2024.

¶11

P.C. :-

¶12

This Writ Petition filed by the Petitioner / Husband

¶13

challenges an order dated 6 October 2022, thereby challenging

¶14

the order passed by the Family Court, Mumbai of interim maintenance.

¶15

Advocate for the Petitioner / Husband submits that

¶16

pursuant to the directions given by this Court, her client has

¶17

1/3

¶18

14-wp1510-23.doc

¶19

already deposited a sum of Rs.15,90,000/- before this Court. On the instructions of her client she submits that the said amount can be allowed to be withdrawn by the Respondent / Wife. She further submits that before the Family Court, Bandra, Mumbai, the Petition filed by the Respondent is pending and in the said Petition, certain documents are taken by the Respondent / Wife.

¶20

Suffice would be the purpose, if the Petition is disposed of with the following directions.

¶21

The Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions :-

¶22

a). The impugned order dated 6 October 2022 will remain in force till the disposal of M.J. Petition No.2515 of 2017.

¶23

b). The amount deposited by the Petitioner/ Husband before this Court being a sum of Rs.15,90,000/-, along with accrued interest, is allowed to be withdrawn by the Respondent / Wife.

¶24

c). M.J. Petition No.2515 of 2017 pending before the Family Court, Bandra, Mumbai is hereby expedited. The Family Court, Bandra, Mumbai to make an endeavour to dispose of the

¶25

2/3

¶26

14-wp1510-23.doc

¶27

said M.J. Petition within a period of eight weeks from today.

¶28

d). The parties are hereby directed that they will not seek unnecessary adjournment before the Family Court, Bandra, Mumbai.

¶29

In view of this order passed, Interim Application (Stamp) No.8941 of 2024 is also disposed of.

¶30

All parties to act on the authenticated copy of this

¶31

order.

¶32

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)

¶33

3/3

Hemant Keshav Badar v. Rohini Hemant Badar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hemant Keshav Badar v. Rohini Hemant Badar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Preeti Keswani Vs Anuj Desai

Preeti Keswani Vs Anuj Desai

Tai Bharat Ghadge vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Mr. Nellaiappan S. Pillai and Anr. Vs Mrs. Krisshna Arjun and Anr.

Sarika Sunil Kamble Vs Sunil Narayan Kamble

Neeta Anand Nagarkar Vs Anand Arvind Nagarkar