Maharashtra Navnirman Kaamgar Sena v. State of Maharashtra and 3 Ors.
Bombay HCWP/4315/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Administrative listing order: several matters could not be heard for want of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks, interim orders continue, pleadings to be filed before next date, and matters listed across various boards in late 2024.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Digitally signed by TRUPTI TRUPTI SADANAND SADANAND BAMNE BAMNE Date: 2024.10.18 12:33:51 +0530
¶2
Trupti .. 1 .. common order 2
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶4
DATE :- 15TH OCTOBER, 2024
¶5
Per Court :-
¶6
- At the time of rising at 5.45 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.
¶7
- In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.
¶8
- Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order,
¶9
if any granted earlier, would continue.
¶10
- The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed
¶11
before the next date.
Coram
AI extract
M.M. Sathaye
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
21 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Shantaram Bhikan Mahajan vs Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation
Rajesh Devidas Kardile vs Panvel Municipal Corporation and Anr.
Dhananjay Sadashiv Gaikwad vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.
Shakuntala Tulshiram Gangurde and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.