Writ petition concerning allotment of tenements by BMC; petitioner sought more than the habitable tenements offered. Petition admitted, but interim relief refused as it would amount to allowing the petition at admission stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
JPP 10. WP 4031.24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 4031 OF 2024
Javed Hasan Ahmed Hasan Shaikh … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents
Mr. A.A. Siddiquie with Mr. Chowdhari Moinuddin i/b. A.A. Siddiquie & Associates for Petitioner.
Ms. S.V. Tondwalkar i/b. Komal Punjabi for Respondent – BMC. Mr. Vishwanath Patil with Mr. Akshay Naidu for Respondent No.4. Ms. Sheetal Ulhas Malvankar, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1 -State.
_______________________________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ. DATE : 29th November 2024.
P.C. :
tenement/s to the Petitioner which as per the photographs annexed to the
documents produced on record, are humanly habitable in condition, the Petitioner’s demands are much more. The said demands cannot be adjudicated at the stage of admission.
( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
1/1
JYOTI Digitally signed byJYOTI PRAKASH PRAKASH PAWAR PAWAR Date: 2024.12.0412:30:56 +0530
Javed Hasan Ahmed Hasan Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
BMC (Respondent No. 2)
A. S. Gadkari
Kamal Khata
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
