Commissioner of Customs Imports v. a K Mani
Case brief
What is this about?
Customs appeal listed for framing of substantial question of law; court observed the framed question was neither a question of law nor substantial and granted a short adjournment.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ppn
1 21.cuapp-8.24.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Digitally signed PRACHI by PRACHIPRANESH PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR NANDIWADEKAR Date: 2024.12.12 CUSTOMS APPEAL NO.8 OF 2024 15:13:14 +0530
The Commissioner of Customs (Imports) .. Appellant Versus A. K. Mani .. Respondent
Mr. J. B. Mishra a/w Ms. Sangeeta Yadav for the appellant.
_______________________________________________________________ CORAM : M. S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ. DATE : 11 December 2024
P.C.:-
- The substantial question of law as framed is neither a question of law nor is it substantial. However, Mr. Mishra submits that appeal does involve substantial question of law and he will formulate if short adjournment is granted today.
- Accordingly, we list this matter on 8 January 2025.
(Jitendra Jain, J .) ( M. S. Sonak, J.)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
The Commissioner of Customs (Imports)
- respondent
A. K. Mani
Coram
M. S. Sonak
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Smaaash Entertainment Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, CIRCLE-16(1)-MUMBAI
Skoda Auto Volkswagen India Pvt. Ltd.Ltd vs the Assessment Unit Income Tax Dept. National Faceless Assessment Centre and Ors.
Badrilal Ghasiram Choudhary vs Union of India Thr the Secetary Ministry of Law and Justice and Anr.
Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 2(3)(1), Mumbai