Writ petition concerning a Family Court matter became infructuous after the child's birthday passed. The court directed both parties to file affidavits of assets and liabilities before the Pune Family Court per Supreme Court directions and disposed of the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28-wp3830-24.doc
vai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL
Digitally signed by VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL Date: 2024.03.27 19:42:03 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO.3830 OF 2024
Sarika S. Kamble ...Petitioner V/s. Sunil N. Kamble ...Respondent
Mr.Anuj A. Shaha for the Petitioner.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATE : 22ND MARCH, 2024.
P.C. :-
1. Mr.Shaha appearing for the Petitioner submits that this
Writ Petition challenges the order dated 18 January 2024. He submits that the Petition has become infructuous, as the birthday of the son Adhiraj was on 8 February 2024. He submits that the Respondent has not filed the affidavit of assets and liabilities before the Family Court at Pune.
1/2
28-wp3830-24.doc
and liabilities as per the directions of the Supreme Court in the
judgment of Rajnesh vs. Neha, (2021) 2 SCC 324 (if at all not
filed) before the Family Court at Pune within two weeks from today.
infructuous.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
2/2
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rajnesh vs. NehaReferred
Rajnesh vs. Neha, (2021) 2 SCC 324 · Who else cites this
Sarika S. Kamble
Sunil N. Kamble
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
