Petitioner sought unconditional leave to withdraw the writ petition against MMRDA; leave granted and the petition disposed as withdrawn, with the interim application also disposed as it did not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm 6-wp3740.2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3740 OF 2024
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.21936 OF 2024
Avinash Panchal …..Petitioner Vs. Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority & Ors. …..Respondents
Adv. Sneha Panchmuk a/w Adv. Shweta Rathod i/by. Elixir Legal Services for the Petitioner.
Adv. Tamanna Bafna i/by Adv. Ajay Khaire for the Respondent No.1. Adv. Mastakar for the Respondent-BMC.
Adv. Niket Jani i/by Jani & Parikh for the Respondent Nos.2 to 6.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ. DATE : 14th NOVEMBER, 2024.
P.C.:-
to withdraw Petition unconditionally.
Leave granted.
No.21936 of 2024 does not survive and is also disposed off.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
Digitally signed by SANJIV SANJIV SHARNAPPA SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR MASHALKAR Date: 2024.11.21 12:41:40 +0530
1/1
Avinash Panchal
Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority
A. S. Gadkari
Kamal Khata
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
