Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as neither the petitioner nor counsel appeared on the hearing date or earlier, indicating no interest in pursuing the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm 17-wp1936.2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1936 OF 2024
Mangesh Gulab Abinave …..Petitioner
Vs.
Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai & Anr. …..Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Ms. K.H. Mastakar i/by. Adv. Komal Punjabi for the Respondent No.1-BMC. Ms. Nazia Sheikh, AGP for the Respondent No.2-State. Mr. Abhishek Deshmukh for the Respondent No.3.
Adv. M.A. Memon i/by Lexim Associates for the Respondent No.5. Mr. Yogesh Patil i/by Adv. Vijay Patil for the Respondent No.6-SRA.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ. DATE : 14th NOVEMBER, 2024.
P.C.:-
2024, none had appeared for the Petitioner.
Petition.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
Digitally signed SANJIV by SANJIVSHARNAPPA SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR MASHALKAR Date: 2024.11.19 10:14:40 +0530
1/1
Mangesh Gulab Abinave
Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai
A.S. Gadkari
Kamal Khata
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
