Shyam Kashinath Koli v. M/S.Essel World Leisure Pv.T Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging an Industrial Court direction requiring complainants to deposit their VRS settlement amount before prosecuting their complaint under Sections 25-O and 25-N of the Industrial Disputes Act. Both sides relied on Supreme Court precedents; the Court found arguable questions and stayed the complaint pending final hearing.
What did the court decide?
Proceedings in Complaint U.LP. 41 OF 2022 stayed till the next date; petition listed for final hearing on 10th October 2024.
What the court decided
18 WP3685.24.doc Dusane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3685 OF 2024
Shyam Kashinath Koli …Petitioner V/s. M/s ESSEL World Leisure Pvt. Ltd. …Respondent
Mr. R.S. Upadhyay, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. Kiran Bapat, Senior Counsel a/w Mr. Mahesh Shukla, Mr. Sachin Pathak and Mr. Niraj Prajapati for Respondent.
CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 23rd September 2024
P.C. :
- By the impugned Order dated 27th March 2024, the learned Member, Industrial Court, Mumbai directed the Complainants who desire to prosecute the complaint to deposit the amount which is paid to them at the time of settlement (VRS compensation) paid by the Respondent-employer in the Industrial Court, Mumbai within a period of four months from the date of said Order. It has been further directed that the Complaint shall proceed qua those complainants only who deposit the amount and would stand dismissed qua those complainants who fail to deposit the amount within above mentioned period and if none of the complainants deposit the amount within above mentioned period, the complaint would stand dismissed in its entirety at the expiry of said period.
1/5
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shyam Kashinath Koli
- respondent
M/s ESSEL World Leisure Pvt. Ltd.
Coram
Madhav J. Jamdar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
15 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Cargo Carriers (India ) Ltd. vs Rameshchandra Maniram Jaiswal
Hdfc Bank Ltd. vs the Dy Commissioner of Labour Kamgar Bhavan
Maharashtra Navnirman Kamgar Sena Thr. Its Authorised Representative vs the Commissioner Nashik Municipal Corporation and Anr.
Apar Industries Limited vs Union of India through the Ministry of Railways