Writ petition disposed as infructuous on the petitioner's counsel's statement that it had become infructuous; no substantive adjudication by the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
278.WP.3264.2011.doc
HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3264 OF 2011
Bahiru Hari Gaidhani (since deceased) through legal heirs Bhimabai Bahiru Gaidhani and Ors. .. Petitioners
Versus
Kamlabai Genu Jadhav (since deceased) through Ashok Genu Jadhav and Ors. .. Respondents
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 15, 2024
P.C.:
1. Mentioned out of turn.
2. Heard Mr. Agrawal, learned Advocate for Petitioners.
3. Mr. Agrawal, learned Advocate appears for the Petitioners
and would submit that the present Writ Petition has become infructuous.
4. Writ Petition is therefore disposed.
H. H. SAWANT
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Digitally signed by HARSHADA HARSHADA HANUMANT HANUMANTSAWANT SAWANT Date: 2024.02.15 18:16:47 +0530
1 of 1
Bahiru Hari Gaidhani (since deceased) through legal heirs Bhimabai Bahiru Gaidhani and Ors.
Kamlabai Genu Jadhav (since deceased) through Ashok Genu Jadhav and Ors.
Milind N. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
