Disposed
Seth Constructions, Nagpur v. the Recovery Officer and the Asstt. P. F. Commissioner, E.P.F.O., Nagpur
Bombay HCWP/3237/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged an EPF recovery demand and sought interim relief pending appeal before a tribunal lacking a Presiding Officer. The court issued notice returnable in June 2024 and stayed execution of the demand on condition the petitioner deposits 25% of the recovery amount within two weeks, failing which the stay stands automatically vacated.
What did the court decide?
Stay of execution of the recovery demand dated 15/05/2024, subject to deposit of 25% of recovery amount within two weeks.