The High Court of Bombay accepted consent terms tendered by counsel for the parties. The court recorded the terms, which were accepted as an undertaking. The Writ Petition was disposed of on the basis of these consent terms without any further adjudication.
Writ petition disposed of in terms of consent terms executed by the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4-wp307-24.doc
vai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL
Digitally signed CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION by VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL Date: 2024.03.16 WRIT PETITION NO.307 OF 2024 18:52:55 +0530
Mrs.Rasika U. Parkar & Anr. ...Petitioners V/s. Urvajit U. Parkar ...Respondent
Mr.J.S. Kini with Mr.Aum Kini i/b Ms.Sapna Krishnappa for the Petitioners.
Mrs.Rasika U. Parkar - Petitioner No.1 present in person.
Mr.A.K. Shukla for the Respondent.
Mr.Urvajit U. Parkar - Respondent present in person.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATE : 14TH MARCH, 2024.
P.C. :-
consent terms dated 14 March 2024 which according to them is duly signed by the parties and their respective counsel. They submit that the contents of the consent terms are explained to the parties in Marathi and they have understood the same. The
1/11
4-wp307-24.doc
same are taken on record and marked “X” for identification.
in Court.
terms are reproduced hereinbelow :-
2/11
4-wp307-24.doc
3/11
4-wp307-24.doc
4/11
4-wp307-24.doc
5/11
4-wp307-24.doc
6/11
4-wp307-24.doc
7/11
4-wp307-24.doc
8/11
4-wp307-24.doc
9/11
4-wp307-24.doc
10/11
4-wp307-24.doc
given in the consent terms. All the statements made in the
consent terms are accepted as an undertaking given to this Court.
the consent terms.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
11/11
Mrs. Rasika U. Parkar & Anr.
Urvajit U. Parkar
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
