of the subject premises was produced wherein after calculation it can be seen that the value of the suit premises, which is situated in a commercial area in central business locality of South Mumbai would have easily fetched Rs.10,000 per sq.ft. He submitted that municipal assessment bill and repairs bill was produced on record. He submitted that therefore, the landlord had claimed compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- per month. He further submits that much later after 5 December 2002, only on 10 December 2004 the possession of the handed over to the landlord, hence, according to him, the mesne profit should have been at the higher side then Rs.2,00,000/- per month. He submitted that the Appellate Court even though considered the evidence produced by the landlord have taken up an average and have arrived at figure Rs.1,00,000/per month as mesne profit payable per month. He submits that even though the landlord is challenging the quantum of which mesne profit has been fixed however, the landlord has not challenged the order passed by the Appellate Bench of the Small Causes. He therefore, submitted that the rate fixed by the Appellate Bench of the Court of Small Causes, should be confirmed by this Court. He submits that the applicant bank has not produced any document on record to prove that the rate fixed by the
