Vishal Vitthal Kondhalkar v. Mayuri Vishal Kondhalkar and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition disposed of in terms of consent terms recorded by the court, with statements accepted as undertakings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3-wp1425-21.doc
vai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed VASANT by VASANT ANANDRAO ANANDRAOIDHOL IDHOLDate: 2024.03.19 WRIT PETITION NO.1425 OF 2021 12:31:13 +0530
Vishal V. Kondhalkar ...Petitioner V/s. Mayuri V. Kondhalkar & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr.Vikas Kolekar for the Petitioner.
Mr.P.B. Gujar for Respondent No.1.
Mr.S.S. Pednekar, APP for the State - Respondent No.2.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATE : 14TH MARCH, 2024.
P.C. :-
No.1 submit that the parties have entered into a consent terms dated 14 March 2024 duly signed by both the parties in presence of their respective counsel. The contents of the consent terms are explained them in Marathi and they understood the same. The same are taken on record and marked “X” for identification.
1/5
3-wp1425-21.doc
2. For ease of reference, a scanned copy of the consent
terms are reproduced hereinbelow :-
2/5
3-wp1425-21.doc
3/5
3-wp1425-21.doc
4/5
3-wp1425-21.doc
accepted as an undertaking given to this Court.
of the consent terms.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
5/5
Vishal V. Kondhalkar
Mayuri V. Kondhalkar
State
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court