Ankur Palace Chsl v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, through Its Commissioner
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
48.WP.2997-24.DOCX
Pradnya
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2997 OF 2024
Ankur Palace CHSL …Petitioner Versus
Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and …Respondents ors.
Mr. Nitin V. Gangal a/w Ms. Prerna Shukla i/b. Ms. Namita Mestry, for the Petitioner.
Ms. Smita Tondwalkar , for the Respondent-MCGM.
CORAM M.S. Sonak & Kamal Khata, JJ. DATED: 19th June 2024
PC:-
1. Heard Mr. Nitin V. Gangal, learned counsel for the Petitioner.
2. Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable on 12th July 2024.
3. Ms. Smita Tondwalkar, learned counsel appears and waives service on behalf of BMC.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ankur Palace CHSL
- respondent
Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay
Coram
M.S. Sonak
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court