Omkar Daulat Pawar v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Administrative listing order: matters could not be heard for want of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks, interim orders to continue, pleadings to be filed, and matters listed on dates in December 2024 and January–February 2025.
What the court decided
TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE
Digitally signed by TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date: 2024.12.03 14:50:08 +0530
Trupti .. 1 .. common order 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ. DATE :- 27 NOVEMBER, 2024
Per Court :-
- At the time of rising at 4.50 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in
paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.
- In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.
- Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.
- The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed before the
Coram
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
ASHWIN D. BHOBE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Vrindavan Co. Op Housing Soc Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra and 4 Ors.
M/S Mamata Medical and General Stores Throu. Its Prop Madanlal Daulatramji Vyas vs the Assistant Commissioner Food and Drugs Administration and Ors.
Vinay Agarwal vs Union of India and Ors.
Ketan Malkan vs Union of India through Ministry of Corporate Affairs