Sulochana Sharad Kulkarni and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. the Secretary Healthe Department and Ors.

Bombay HC12 Nov 2024WP/11611/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim procedural order in a writ petition: impleadment of the Principal Secretary, Urban Development as Respondent No.7 was permitted, the AGP waived service, and timelines were set for affidavits in reply and rejoinder.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to add Principal Secretary, Urban Development as Respondent No.7; affidavit timelines fixed; matter listed for 9 January 2025.

Sulochana Sharad Kulkarni and Ors. vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

28 wp 11611-24.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 11611 OF 2024

¶4

LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE

¶5

Digitally signed by LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE Date: 2024.12.12 17:15:06 +0530

¶6

Sulochana Sharad Kulkarni & Ors. .. Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents

¶9

Adv. Alankar Kirpekar a/w Sagar Kasar, Chaitali Bhogle, Ayush Tiwari, Rishabh Tiwari & Amol Wagle i/b. Sagar Kasar for the Petitioners .

¶10

Adv. P. P. Kakade, Addl.G.P. a/w Vrishali Raje, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 & 7.

¶11

CORAM: B. P. COLABAWALLA & SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ.

¶12

DATE: DECEMBER 11, 2024

¶13

P. C.

¶14

Leave granted to the Petitioners to add the Principal Secretary,

¶15

Urban Development, State of Maharashtra as Respondent No.7 in the above Writ Petition.

¶16

The amendment shall be carried out forthwith in front of the Associate. Re-verification is dispensed with.

¶17

Page 1 of 2 DECEMBER 11, 2024

¶18

Laxmi

¶19

28 wp 11611-24.doc

¶20

The learned AGP appears on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 & 7 and waives service. He requests for two weeks’ time to file an affidavit in reply to the above Writ Petition.

¶21

Acceding to his request, we direct that the affidavit in reply shall be filed on or before 30^th December, 2024 and a copy of the same shall be served on the Advocate appearing for the Petitioners.

¶22

If the Petitioners want to file any affidavit in rejoinder, they may do so, by filing the same on or before 6^th January, 2025, and a copy of the same shall be served on the Respondents.

¶23

We place the above matter on 9^th January, 2025, under the caption “for ad-interim reliefs”.

¶24

We put the parties to notice that we may dispose of the Writ Petition at that stage itself, time permitting.

¶25

This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary/ Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a digitally signed copy of this order.

¶26

[SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.] [B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.]

¶27

Page 2 of 2 DECEMBER 11, 2024

¶28

Laxmi

Sulochana Sharad Kulkarni and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. the Secretary Healthe Department and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sulochana Sharad Kulkarni and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. the Secretary Healthe Department and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sunil Agarwal vs Asst. Registrar of Companies

Shaikh Zakir Gani and Ors. vs the State Ofmaharashtra Minority Dept Thr Its Secretary and Ors.

Eden Castle vs Darshan Sagar Developers

The Commissioner of Kendriya Vidyalya Sangathan vs Mrs Pama Yuvraj Ahire Wife of Yuvraj Ahire

Gumtree Traps Pvt. Ltd. Th. Its Director Gururaj Agnihotri vs Animal Welfare Board of India Th Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Gov of India

Jitendra Nautamlal Mehta vs the State of Maharashtra Throu. Govt Pleader and Ors.