Partly allowed

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Mumbai Thr. Deputy General Manager v. Joint Chief Controller of Explosive, Petroleum and Explosive Safety Org. (Peso), Mumbai

Bombay HC5 Sept 2024WP/2643/2024

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-bench disposal ordering additional submission of documents and stay conditions before discharge.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order set aside; petitioner directed to submit documents; adverse orders to be stayed for two weeks; entire process to complete within three months.

What the court decided

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Mumbai Thr… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:10011-DB

¶2

7-WP-2643-2024.odt 1

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 2643 of 2024

¶5

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, through its Deputy General Manager,
Nagpur

¶6

vs.

¶7

Joint Chief Controller of Explosives, Petroleum and Explosive Safety Organization
(PESO), Mumbai

¶8

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order
Coram, appearances, Court's Orders
or directions and Registrar's order

¶9

 Mr. V. V. Bhangde, Advocate for petitioner.
 Mr. N.S.Deshpande, DSGI for respondent no.1.
 Mr. H.D.Dangre, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 to 9.

¶10

CORAM :- NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
DATE :- 5th SEPTEMBER, 2024

¶11

P. C.

¶12

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶13

2.Mr. Bhangde, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
additional documents with pleadings shall be submitted to the
respondent-Authority by 07.10.2024, advance copy of which shall
be made available to Mr. Dangre, learned counsel appearing for the
respondent nos. 2 to 9.

¶14

3.The respondent nos. 2 to 9 can also submit their say to the
same by 21.10.2024.

¶15

4. The respondent no.1 thereafter shall cause notice of hearing
to the parties and pass reasoned order.

¶16

5.If the order adverse to the interest of the petitioner is passed,

¶17

same shall remain stayed for a period of two weeks after its copy

¶18

7-WP-2643-2024.odt 2

¶19

being served on the petitioner.

¶20

6. The writ petition stands disposed of as the the order impugned is set aside in view of above.

¶21

7. We expect entire process shall be completed within a period of three months from today.

¶22

 (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

¶23

Andurkar.

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Mumbai Thr. Deputy General Manager v. Joint Chief Controller of Explosive, Petroleum and Explosive Safety Org. (Peso), Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Mumbai Thr. Deputy General Manager v. Joint Chief Controller of Explosive, Petroleum and Explosive Safety Org. (Peso), Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nilkanth Mahadev Nandanwar @, Nilkanth Mahadev Gatakhaye Vs Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur through Its Member Secretary and Other

Jitesh Shamlal Yadav and Others Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secretary, Dept. of Revenue, Mumbai and Ors.

Vijay S/O Madhukar Dhakate Vs Joint Commissioner and Vice-Chairman, Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee and Anr.

Sanket Convent School,Run by Society Sudama Bahu-Udeshiya Shikshan Sanstha, Thr.Sec.,P. C. Tandaiyy Vs the State of Maharashtra, Education and Sports Department, through Its Secretary, Mumbai and 5 Othe

Nilesh S/O Mukund Dhote and Others Vs Union of India, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Coal and Petroleum, New Delhi and Ors.

M/S. Talha Enterprise, Thr. Its Proprietor, Mr. Faizan Ali Siddiqui Vs State of Maha., Thr. Secy., Ministry of Agri. and Animal Husb. Dairy Devpt. and Fisheries and Ors.